Turniej Indywidualny 329: A Sękowski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | K Bazeli-J Rozenberg,T Wiśniewski-* | 10 | WE | 3 | N | 4 | -1 | +100 | 70.59% | 70.59% | ||
K Bazeli-T Wiśniewski,*-J Rozenberg | 11 | WE | 2 | N | A | -2 | +100 | 63.24% | 66.91% | |||
K Bazeli-*,J Rozenberg-T Wiśniewski | 12 | NS | 4 | W | 4 | -1 | +50 | 91.18% | 75.00% | |||
2 | P Łużecki-J Pasich,M Kowalski-* | 7 | WE | 4 | E | 6 | -1 | -100 | 31.84% | 64.21% | ||
P Łużecki-M Kowalski,*-J Pasich | 8 | WE | 4 | N | Q | +2 | -480 | 51.47% | 61.66% | |||
P Łużecki-*,J Pasich-M Kowalski | 9 | NS | 4 | N | 9 | +3 | +510 | 30.88% | 56.53% | |||
3 | A Jeleniewski-F Svindahl,J Klimczak-* | 4 | WE | 4 | E | J | +1 | +650 | 52.94% | 56.02% | ||
A Jeleniewski-J Klimczak,*-F Svindahl | 5 | WE | 3 | W | 5 | +3 | +170 | 0.00% | 49.02% | |||
A Jeleniewski-*,F Svindahl-J Klimczak | 6 | NS | 4 | W | 6 | +1 | -650 | 51.51% | 49.29% | |||
4 | A Łagosz-M Domagałło,R Nowicki-* | 1 | WE | 1 | S | 5 | = | -90 | 93.90% | 53.75% | ||
A Łagosz-R Nowicki,*-M Domagałło | 2 | WE | 4 | S | 6 | = | -620 | 13.24% | 50.07% | |||
A Łagosz-*,M Domagałło-R Nowicki | 3 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | +2 | +150 | 35.29% | 48.84% | |||
5 | A Bocheński-A Suwik,M Małypan-* | 13 | WE | 4 | N | A | +1 | -650 | 8.82% | 45.76% | ||
A Bocheński-M Małypan,*-A Suwik | 14 | WE | 3 | W | 10 | +1 | +130 | 51.47% | 46.17% | |||
A Bocheński-*,A Suwik-M Małypan | 15 | NS | 6× | N | Q | -7 | -2000 | 0.00% | 43.09% | |||
6 | J Kudelski-W Cała,*-L Mandecki | 25 | WE | 2× | E | A | -2 | -500 | 14.71% | 41.32% | ||
J Kudelski-*,L Mandecki-W Cała | 26 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | -1 | -100 | 25.00% | 40.36% | |||
J Kudelski-L Mandecki,W Cała-* | 27 | WE | 2× | N | 6 | -1 | +100 | 34.87% | 40.05% | |||
7 | S Brzozowski-W Burakowski,*-M Makulec | 16 | WE | 7 | E | 9 | = | +2220 | 80.88% | 42.20% | ||
S Brzozowski-*,M Makulec-W Burakowski | 17 | NS | 4 | S | 2 | +2 | +480 | 45.59% | 42.37% | |||
S Brzozowski-M Makulec,W Burakowski-* | 18 | WE | 4 | E | 4 | -4 | -200 | 42.43% | 42.37% | |||
8 | R Zubiel-Z Pinkiewicz,*-M Tomczewska | 22 | WE | 3 | W | J | = | +140 | 64.71% | 43.39% | ||
R Zubiel-*,M Tomczewska-Z Pinkiewicz | 23 | NS | 4 | E | A | = | -620 | 32.35% | 42.91% | |||
R Zubiel-M Tomczewska,Z Pinkiewicz-* | 24 | WE | 3 | S | K | -2 | +100 | 35.29% | 42.59% | |||
9 | W Wejknis-J Żebrowski,*-B Lesiecka | 28 | WE | 4 | E | 3 | = | +420 | 10.29% | 41.30% | ||
W Wejknis-*,B Lesiecka-J Żebrowski | 29 | NS | 6 | N | 7 | = | +1440 | 88.24% | 43.10% | |||
W Wejknis-B Lesiecka,J Żebrowski-* | 30 | WE | 3 | W | A | = | +140 | 11.76% | 41.94% | |||
10 | Z Stawski-T Kaczanowski,*-T Spodenkiewicz | 19 | WE | 3 | W | 3 | +2 | +660 | 41.18% | 41.92% | ||
Z Stawski-*,T Spodenkiewicz-T Kaczanowski | 20 | NS | 3× | N | 10 | -2 | -500 | 22.06% | 41.23% | |||
Z Stawski-T Spodenkiewicz,T Kaczanowski-* | 21 | WE | 3 | S | 8 | = | -600 | 74.91% | 42.35% | |||
SUMA: | 42.35% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 42.35% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 127 |
Pary.4.1.0.22 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2010-07-22 o 14:29:54